<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Trajectories</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stickwithanose.com/2010/01/01/trajectories/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stickwithanose.com/2010/01/01/trajectories/</link>
	<description>On the Poverty of Social Discourse</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 03:37:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stick</title>
		<link>http://www.stickwithanose.com/2010/01/01/trajectories/comment-page-1/#comment-352</link>
		<dc:creator>Stick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 15:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stickwithanose.com/?p=1395#comment-352</guid>
		<description>Agreed... One should always be suspicious of anything coming from Rasmussen, but I do think that it&#039;s tapping into something approximating the zeitgeist of contemporary American culture. How we [as a society] react to the realization of economic stagnation will quickly move into some kind of action. The question is what kind...? Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed&#8230; One should always be suspicious of anything coming from Rasmussen, but I do think that it&#8217;s tapping into something approximating the zeitgeist of contemporary American culture. How we [as a society] react to the realization of economic stagnation will quickly move into some kind of action. The question is what kind&#8230;? Thanks for sharing your thoughts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: williamjames</title>
		<link>http://www.stickwithanose.com/2010/01/01/trajectories/comment-page-1/#comment-351</link>
		<dc:creator>williamjames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jan 2010 06:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stickwithanose.com/?p=1395#comment-351</guid>
		<description>Interesting piece but I wouldn&#039;t go to the well with the results of that opinion poll.  From wiki:

&quot;...John Marshal of Talking Points Memo commented on their [Rasmussen] reliability in a February 2009 article:
The toplines tend to be a bit toward the Republican side of the spectrum, compared to the average of other polls. But if you factor that in they&#039;re pretty reliable...But the qualitative questions, in terms of their phrasing and so forth, are frequently skewed to give answers friendly toward GOP or conservative viewpoints...&quot;

I agree completely that the U.S. is re-polarized.  It seems, though, that Americans are stunned more than activated by evidence that they will not &quot;get ahead&quot;, &quot;find a good job&quot;, or establish a &quot;college fund&quot; for little Sam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting piece but I wouldn&#8217;t go to the well with the results of that opinion poll.  From wiki:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;John Marshal of Talking Points Memo commented on their [Rasmussen] reliability in a February 2009 article:<br />
The toplines tend to be a bit toward the Republican side of the spectrum, compared to the average of other polls. But if you factor that in they&#8217;re pretty reliable&#8230;But the qualitative questions, in terms of their phrasing and so forth, are frequently skewed to give answers friendly toward GOP or conservative viewpoints&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>I agree completely that the U.S. is re-polarized.  It seems, though, that Americans are stunned more than activated by evidence that they will not &#8220;get ahead&#8221;, &#8220;find a good job&#8221;, or establish a &#8220;college fund&#8221; for little Sam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
